There is a fundamental incompatibility, between Scotland’s Constitutional Sovereignty, and London rule

Comment by Breeks on Wings Over Scotland

I agree, that it was wrong to give Westminster the chance to rule on anything to do with Scotland, BUT it has been done now, and it has highlighted that there NEVER was any equal union.

HOWEVER, the bigger question now for Mr Neale Hanvey is, WHAT NEXT? If you do not have an answer for us Neale, ALL you are doing is what the scum SNP have been doing for 10 years, broken promise after broken promise, and that certainly won’t garner any trust.

To borrow a phrase from the Highlander movie, there can be only one. There is a fundamental incompatibility, between Scotland’s Constitutional Sovereignty, and London rule. What is more open to question, is how many of those espousing Scottish Independence do not actually believe in its legitimacy, in law. This “hope” needs converted into belief.

Meanwhile, the longer our politicians play the UK game, but lose that game, the more precedents are set which bolster UK legitimacy, and then need to be reversed.

For example, Brexit was such a golden opportunity for us. Michel Barnier was telegraphing the benchmark requirement, that Brexit had to be both lawful and constitutional, before the final Brexit Agreement could be ratified. He put our sovereign Constitution front and centre, before the whole of Europe. Yet Scotland, via Sturgeon’s corrupt regime, didn’t utter a squeak. Our reward? Subjugation and Brexit.

Had the Claim of Right been cited as a constitutional anomaly in 2016, even without formal clarification, clarification which could only have gone Scotland’s way, then it becomes very hard to see how Brexit could have been finalised. Ever.

That didn’t happen, as we all know. Brexit is now a precedent, where Scotland’s democratic and sovereign will was subjugated, yet riots and ructions, came there none. None whatsoever.

Scotland will NEVER again find itself blessed with such a golden opportunity, to collapse this farce of a Union. And that profound and debilitating weakness in Scottish Government will sink Scotland’s interests again, and again, and yet again, until the Scottish people have constitutional leverage over our elected assemblies, and representatives.

It’s a bit glib saying it, but it’s true. The First Nation which needs to recognise Scotland’s sovereign legitimacy, is Scotland itself.

That being said, however, by itself, it isn’t enough.

Before Scotland can end this Union, we need to have a “what next” proposal, which is both cohesive and redoubtable, and recognised by our own, and other nations as watertight and credible. What actually happens on Day 1 of Independence, what meaningful changes occur, and what happens if, or when, Westminster refuses to relinquish control? We need a new Wee Blue Book, that’s a lot heavier than the last.

In other words, we still need to do all the things the SNP studiously hasn’t been doing these past 10 years, actually preparing for Independence.

Furthermore, we need to reconcile our differences across our Movement. Not withstanding the wreckage of the SNP, ardent Independentists such as Roddy McLeod Barrheadboy, ALBA, and indeed SALVO, indeed all of us, MUST be on the same page.

We must structure our Independence Movement like a fully integrated, combined forces Task Force. Where a Military strike force requires it’s Air Force, Navy, and Army, to work together in coordinated mutual support, so we need our Independence Movement to have our Constitutional element, working hand-in-glove with our political element, and our grassroots land-army fully committed to the plan, and confident of victory.

For all that cry for unity, having the SNP on board gives me the dry heave.

The last vital component in that military metaphor by the way, is the fulsome support of Allies, and a diligent and just UN Resolution to deliver.

Independence is in tatters right now, because we trusted our dream to imbeciles in the SNP, who couldn’t secure Independence if it was handed to them on a plate, as it was, in 2016. The word “imbecile” is a kindness, because I believe certain individuals are much, much, worse than merely incompetent.

That people like Neale Hanvey are engineering “problems” with Westminster rule, is a good thing, because the time is approaching which ALL of Westminster rule must go, and a lot of people need to wake up and smell the coffee. “Their” political chicanery will never deliver benefit to Scotland. It will always deliver the reverse. It will NEVER deliver Independence, it will ALWAYS frustrate it.

Holyrood, and even a limp bus load of 56 SNP MP’s delivers precisely ZERO threat to Westminster rule. We, the Scottish people, need to wrestle control away from Whitehall, then engineer and codify an alternative manifestation of Scottish Government. COMPLETELY alternative.

Heads up people. This alternative manifestation of Scottish Government exists, but so far, only in rudimentary form. It is your Liberation Movement, which yet needs to combine with a modern interpretation of a Convention of the Estates, and thereafter challenge Westminster’s professed sovereignty with a 2024 invocation of the Claim of Right. Not to remove a King as in 1689, but to remove and expel a foreign government usurping Scottish Sovereignty, and plundering Scotland’s wealth and resources.

We have so very much to do, such mechanisms to build, tools and friendships to forge, yet here we sit, idle and incapacitated, and hostage to the vagrancies of a rogue, wokist agenda, which commandeers all of our attention, and shepherds Scotland further and further away from sovereign Independence.

We need leadership. We need structure. Those trying to make progress need your support and encouragement. The path will become clearer, the further we step away from the catastrophic Sturgeon era. 

Take comfort too, that Humza Yousaf won’t last a decade, but we must be better focussed. Yousaf is a small bit player in a Mickey Mouse Assembly, ensnared and codified by Westminster and the colonial Scotland Act.